Security Assessment and TestingMedium

CISSP Practice Question: What would MOST likely happen if a company prioritizes cost-cutting over comprehensive…

Published August 7, 2026 · Free daily CISSP practice question
What would MOST likely happen if a company prioritizes cost-cutting over comprehensive security assessments?
  1. A.Increased security breaches
  2. B.Improved operational efficiency
  3. C.Higher employee satisfaction
  4. D.Enhanced customer trust
Correct answer: A. Increased security breaches

Correct Answer: A. Increased security breaches

Explanation (CISSP Manager Logic):

Prioritizing cost-cutting over assessments creates visibility gaps that hide critical vulnerabilities from leadership. Without regular testing, unpatched risks accumulate, directly increasing the probability of a successful exploit and significant financial loss.

By conducting comprehensive assessments, you:

  • Identify and remediate vulnerabilities before they are exploited.
  • Align security spending with the organization’s actual risk profile.
  • Ensure continuous compliance with regulatory and legal obligations.

While the other options are relevant, they fall short because:

  • B: Reducing security overhead creates technical debt and operational fragility that eventually disrupts business.
  • C: Security budget cuts do not correlate with satisfaction and often increase stress during inevitable incident responses.
  • D: Customer trust relies on data protection; neglecting security investments inevitably leads to trust-eroding breaches.

Think like a manager:

Security is a business enabler and a risk management function. Managers must balance budget constraints against the potential catastrophic impact of a breach to ensure long-term resilience.

Ready to find out if you'd pass?

5,000+ expert-calibrated questions, adaptive CAT mock exams, and gap analysis that shows exactly what to study next.

Try 5 free questions Start 7-day free trial
← Previous question All questions Next question →