Software Development SecurityEasy

CISSP Practice Question: In a large financial institution, what would MOST likely happen if the…

Published August 8, 2026 · Free daily CISSP practice question
In a large financial institution, what would MOST likely happen if the security team delays implementing code review processes?
  1. A.Increased vulnerability exposure
  2. B.Improved development speed
  3. C.Enhanced team collaboration
  4. D.Lower operational costs
Correct answer: A. Increased vulnerability exposure

Correct Answer: A. Increased vulnerability exposure

Explanation (CISSP Manager Logic):

Delaying code reviews allows security flaws to migrate into production, increasing technical debt and the organizational attack surface. From a risk management perspective, failing to identify vulnerabilities early in the SDLC elevates the likelihood of data breaches and regulatory non-compliance.

By implementing code reviews, you:

  • Reduce the attack surface through early flaw detection.
  • Lower the total cost of ownership by fixing bugs before deployment.
  • Ensure alignment with security frameworks and compliance mandates.

While the other options are relevant, they fall short because:

  • B: Skipping security checks creates "false speed" that is eventually lost to emergency patching and rework.
  • C: Security friction and poor code quality typically degrade team morale and cross-departmental trust.
  • D: The long-term costs of incident response and remediation far outweigh short-term operational savings.

Think like a manager:

Prioritize proactive security controls over reactive recovery to protect the business from catastrophic financial and reputational damage. Security must be integrated into the SDLC to ensure long-term operational resilience.

Ready to find out if you'd pass?

5,000+ expert-calibrated questions, adaptive CAT mock exams, and gap analysis that shows exactly what to study next.

Try 5 free questions Start 7-day free trial
← Previous question All questions Next question →